Biden’s new ‘misinformation czar’ is a Hunter laptop denier

Fox guarding the henhouse much?

Nina Jankowicz, US Embassy Vienna, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Share
Text
Text Size
Small
Medium
Large
Line Spacing
Small
Normal
Large

The Biden team is following in Barack Obama’s footsteps by launching a Disinformation Governance Board. And the current administration is even one-upping the former president by employing the Department of Homeland Security to combat what it calls “misinformation.”

Obama created a website in 2011 called “Attack Watch” to counter what his 2012 campaign would label as smears and lies. In 2013, his surrogate Stephanie Cutter was appointed head of his Organizing for Action “Truth Team.” Just last week, Obama waded back into the debate about “disinformation” without any sense of self-awareness or irony.

Biden’s disinformation board is,…

The Biden team is following in Barack Obama’s footsteps by launching a Disinformation Governance Board. And the current administration is even one-upping the former president by employing the Department of Homeland Security to combat what it calls “misinformation.”

Obama created a website in 2011 called “Attack Watch” to counter what his 2012 campaign would label as smears and lies. In 2013, his surrogate Stephanie Cutter was appointed head of his Organizing for Action “Truth Team.” Just last week, Obama waded back into the debate about “disinformation” without any sense of self-awareness or irony.

Biden’s disinformation board is, however, less forthcoming with its own information. Will the department have cabinet members? Must its directors be approved by Congress? Who knows? The Biden administration sure isn’t saying.

The Disinformation Governance Board already has a director. Politico reports that Nina Jankowicz has been tapped to help the Biden White House counter what it calls “misinformation related to homeland security, focused specifically on irregular migration and Russia.”

The problem is that Jankowicz has her own history of trafficking disinformation. In October 2020, for instance, she tweeted:

In the same month, she again tweeted about Hunter’s laptop, writing:

It’s been confirmed, of course, not only by the New York Post, which broke the original story, but also by the Washington Post and New York Times, that Hunter Biden’s laptop and emails are real and not a product of Russian misinformation.

In August 2020, Jankowicz promoted a podcast on disinformation with none other than Christopher Steele, the disgraced intel agent behind the debunked and infamous Steele Dossier.

Jankowicz continued her laptop skepticism in March 2021, tweeting:

Jankowicz has not offered any corrections to her assertions, on Twitter or otherwise, instead attempting only one “explanation” to the first tweet I referenced:

Both the attempt to discredit the Hunter Biden laptop story and the media’s embrace of the Steele Dossier are proven disinformation in and of themselves. Thus are the DHS and Jankowicz not intent on stopping disinformation but on cutting off information they find unfavorable.

Joe Biden and Barack Obama cannot be the stewards of disinformation, and no government agency should be given authoritative power over online platforms to decide what is “misinformation” and what’s not. The term “Orwellian” gets thrown around a lot, but in this case, it fits. This administration is attempting to create a Ministry of Truth with a director who’s proven herself to be just another corrupt partisan.