The cashless lobby is cashing in on the COVID-19 crisis

What does evidence matter when you have a multi-million payments industry to promote?

cash
WASHINGTON, DC – MARCH 24: Sheets of one dollar bills run through the printing press at the Bureau of Engraving and Printing on March 24, 2015 in Washington, DC. The roots of The Bureau of Engraving and Printing can be traced back to 1862, when a single room was used in the basement of the main Treasury building before moving to its current location on 14th Street in 1864. The Washington printing facility has been responsible for printing all of the paper Federal Reserve notes up until 1991 when it shared the printing responsibilities with a new western facility that opened in Fort Worth, Texas. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
Share
Text
Text Size
Small
Medium
Large
Line Spacing
Small
Normal
Large

Coronavirus, we have been warned many times, has brought scammers out in force. But lobbyists are not far behind. Their activities may not be illegal, but they are pretty disgraceful nonetheless. Hardly had the coronavirus outbreak begun in January than my email inbox began to fill up with press releases claiming that the contagion was being spread by banknotes and coins — coming, er, from businesses with a vested interest in cashless payments. In Britain, the payments industry seized the moment to lobby the government — successfully — for the limit on payments via contactless…

Coronavirus

, we have been warned many times, has brought scammers out in force. But lobbyists are not far behind. Their activities may not be illegal, but they are pretty disgraceful nonetheless. Hardly had the coronavirus outbreak begun in January than my email inbox began to fill up with press releases claiming that the contagion was being spread by banknotes and coins — coming, er, from businesses with a vested interest in cashless payments. In Britain, the payments industry seized the moment to lobby the government — successfully — for the limit on payments via contactless cards to be raised from £30 to £45. The new limit duly came into effect on April 1.

In March, a comment from a World Health Organization official, advising that people wash their hands after handling cash was mysteriously elevated into claim that ‘dirty banknotes may be spreading the coronavirus’ — as one newspaper put it. The WHO was later moved to disown the comments. Virologists have been largely dismissive of the idea that we are catching coronavirus from cash, emphasizing that a far more likely route of transmission between people is via airborne water droplets. Lothar Wieler of Germany’s Robert Koch Institute has said that ‘virus transmission through banknotes has no particular significance’.

Given the number of surfaces you have to touch when you go shopping or visit a café — the door handles, the cups, plates, the goods you are buying — it is pretty ridiculous to single out cash for spreading germs. But then what does evidence matter when you have a multi-million payments industry to promote? The reason we are forever being bombarded by propaganda advocating a cashless society is that vast sum have been invested in the fintech industry — $19 billion in 2016 alone — in the expectation of a handsome return. According to the Boston Consulting Group by 2023 the industry is expecting to double the $1 trillion it takes in fees from handling electronic payments. Besides those fees there is a vast industry in collating data on our spending habits — very difficult to collect when we spend cash but very easy when we use cards and cell phones.

***
Get three months’ free access to The Spectator USA website —
then just $3.99/month. Subscribe here

***